The Waterbury Republican-American today (Friday, September 13, 2013)
published an article about the failed Oslo Accords: "
20 YEARS
LATER, NO PEACE, Mideast accords of 1993 see little hope of
reality." This article provides an opportunity to write
letters in response similar to a letter, also included below,
published today in The Boston Globe. We also include a copy of the
excellent op-ed to which that letter responded; both have plenty of
ideas that may be used in a letter to the Waterbury
Republican-American, which may be sent by email to
.
We include the article along with some comments and the excellent
letter and op-ed in The Boston Globe.
Waterbury Republican-American
September 13, 2013
20 YEARS LATER, NO PEACE
Mideast accords of 1993 see little hope of reality
ASSOCIATED PRESS
ABU DIS, West Bank - In 1993, the words rang hopeful and historic.
Israel and the PLO agreed "it is time to put an end to decades of
confrontation and conflict," live in peaceful co-existence and reach
a "just, lasting and comprehensive peace settlement."
Twenty years later, the words that launched Israeli-Palestinian
talks on dividing the Holy Land into two states ring hollow to many
on both sides. Negotiators say mistakes they made then are causing
damage to this day.
Palestinians seem no closer now than they were 20 years ago to a
state in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and east Jerusalem, and some
argue they are worse off. The number of Israeli settlers has
doubled. East Jerusalem is cut off by an Israeli barrier. Gaza,
ruled by the Islamic militant Hamas since 2007, is turning into a
distinct enclave.
Many Israelis, scarred by Palestinian suicide bombings and rocket
fire from Gaza, are skeptical of the other side's intentions and
believe the politically divided Palestinians cannot carry out a
peace deal.