First, please, see my article, up
today on American Thinker. It takes on JStreet's advocacy of the "two
state solution," but can be utilized in critiquing that "solution" beyond
what JStreet says:
~~~~~~~~~~
I wrote yesterday about tensions emerging in the US-Israel
relationship, and noted some hot words that allegedly passed between
PM Netanyahu and US Ambassador to Israel Dan Shapiro, on the issue of Obama's
policy on Iran. There have since been some denials of this report (second
hand: of the "I spoke to the PMO's office and was told it never happened"
variety).
While I cannot verify with certainty the veracity of that report, I would
like to move beyond it to a statement (this one verifiable) by a US
official that certainly exposes the light between the US and Israel:
Last week, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff General Martin Dempsey made a statement indicating that while
Israel could delay Iran's nuclear program, it could not stop
it. Then he said:
"I don't want to be complicit if they [Israel] choose to do it."
Complicit? Complicit? The clear sense meaning of this
is being associated with or participating in a wrongful act.
This is how Dempsey sees the matter? And how Obama has Israel's
back?
Why is it that the Obama administration would prefer not to be associated
with any Israel military action against Iran? Do they hope to avoid
Iranian retaliation against their installations? Or to assure voters
that they had nothing to do with it? Or both?
~~~~~~~~~~
A senior Israeli government official cited today in the JPost, who
called Dempsey's words "strange," further said:
"These comments are also a bit strange because they were said in a
week when the IAEA released a report that seems to confirm all of Israel's
concerns, and during a week where the international effort to isolate Iran
and subject it to international pressure took a severe blow with the
Non-Aligned Movement in Tehran."
~~~~~~~~~~
I hope all those who still think Obama is pro-Israel are paying
attention.
~~~~~~~~~~
I also recommend an editorial from the Wall Street Journal, "Why
Israel Doesn't Trust Obama: The US is harder on its ally than on Iran's nuclear
program."
~~~~~~~~~~
The 50 families of Migron have been moved out. The Court deadline
was Tuesday, but in a not-unexpected move, the police and IDF came today to
do the evictions. Some families went ahead of time
voluntarily. What resistance there was by residents was of a
peaceful nature, not violent.
Some teenagers from neighboring communities came into the community,
challenged border guards and climbed up on the roof of a home and refused to
come down as an act of resistance. You can see pictures of this
here:
~~~~~~~~~~
The fact that the Migron residents made a decision to go quietly does not
mean for a moment that they respect the judgment that was issued against
them. They issued a statement, written before the actual
evacuation, that read:
"This week, the forces of destruction sent by Netanyahu, Begin and Ya'alon,
will rise on Migron to destroy it.
"The residents of Migron feel betrayed and pained by this move, and protest the miserable, unnecessary devastation about to happen here.
"The residents of Migron never have, and never will, cooperate with the razing of their community. We call on everyone to protest and decry the terrible destruction condoned by the Likud government.
"To all those who seek to harm us, we say: We will not break and we will not yield. Today everyone already knows – the story of Migron will end with at least two new communities."
~~~~~~~~~~
Well, I hereby protest and decry what has happened here. I concur with Rabbi Mordecai Rabinovitch, a resident of Migron, who refused to accept the eviction notice served on him, and said:
"This is a clearly immoral act, even if it is backed by a High Court of Justice order. I don't know what a 'peaceful evacuation' means..." ~~~~~~~~~~
If there is any "good" news here, it is that a crisis was averted because of the action of one very angry minister of the government who decided to act when he learned that the caravans to which the Migron residents were to be moved were not ready. It is to his credit that the residents have been moved, instead, to a residential school property in the community of Ofra until their new caravans can be completed.
As to the residents' reference to "two new communities," I assume this alludes to Netanyahu's schizoid promise to keep building, even as he doesn't fight for the rights of communities that already exist. One new community, certainly, will be Givat HaYakev, where the former residents of Migron will ultimately be settled.
~~~~~~~~~~
"The residents of Migron feel betrayed and pained by this move, and protest the miserable, unnecessary devastation about to happen here.
"The residents of Migron never have, and never will, cooperate with the razing of their community. We call on everyone to protest and decry the terrible destruction condoned by the Likud government.
"To all those who seek to harm us, we say: We will not break and we will not yield. Today everyone already knows – the story of Migron will end with at least two new communities."
~~~~~~~~~~
Well, I hereby protest and decry what has happened here. I concur with Rabbi Mordecai Rabinovitch, a resident of Migron, who refused to accept the eviction notice served on him, and said:
"This is a clearly immoral act, even if it is backed by a High Court of Justice order. I don't know what a 'peaceful evacuation' means..." ~~~~~~~~~~
If there is any "good" news here, it is that a crisis was averted because of the action of one very angry minister of the government who decided to act when he learned that the caravans to which the Migron residents were to be moved were not ready. It is to his credit that the residents have been moved, instead, to a residential school property in the community of Ofra until their new caravans can be completed.
As to the residents' reference to "two new communities," I assume this alludes to Netanyahu's schizoid promise to keep building, even as he doesn't fight for the rights of communities that already exist. One new community, certainly, will be Givat HaYakev, where the former residents of Migron will ultimately be settled.
~~~~~~~~~~
©
Arlene Kushner. This material is produced by Arlene Kushner,
functioning as an independent journalist. Permission is granted for it to be
reproduced only
with
proper attribution.
This material
is transmitted by Arlene only to persons who have requested it or agreed to
receive it. If you are on the list and wish to be removed, contact Arlene and
include your name in the text of the
message.
No comments:
Post a Comment