data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7037/a703748e23a3c0641dc611e9df9eb8888d721b59" alt="Le-P.-Georges-Vandenbeusch-enleve-au-Cameroun-avait-choisi-de-rester-pres-de-ses-paroissiens_article_popin.jpg"
"As for the captives, the amir [ruler] has the choice of taking the most beneficial action of four possibilities: the first to put them to death by cutting their necks; the second, to enslave them and apply the laws of slavery regarding their sale and manumission; the third, to ransom them in exchange for goods or prisoners; and fourth, to show favor to them and pardon them. Allah, may he be exalted, says, 'When you encounter those [infidels] who deny [the Truth=Islam] then strike [their] necks' (Qur'an sura 47, verse 4)" — Abu’l-Hasan al-Mawardi, al-Ahkam as-Sultaniyyah (The Laws of Islamic Governance), trans. by Dr. Asadullah Yate, (London), Ta-Ha Publishers Ltd., 1996, p. 192.
This reads like a machine translation, but it gives you the idea. "Headlines: Nigeria: Father Georges denies being released by 'compassion,'" from Racers Republic, January 2 (thanks to TRACTerrorism.org; spelling and grammar as in the original):