The recent deal struck between the West
and Iran that is supposed to limit Iran’s nuclear program has put Israel
in a difficult position. Its major ally — the U.S. — has chosen a
diplomatic route to prevent Iran from building a nuclear bomb. But the
deal will only last six months and there is no guarantee diplomacy will
work.
As Norman Podhoretz wrote in the Wall Street Journal [1] recently, a “new consensus” on Iran has emerged that posits the notion that the only thing worse than Iran getting the bomb is taking military action to prevent it.
As Norman Podhoretz wrote in the Wall Street Journal [1] recently, a “new consensus” on Iran has emerged that posits the notion that the only thing worse than Iran getting the bomb is taking military action to prevent it.
Adherents of the new consensus would have us believe that only two choices remain: a war to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons or containment of a nuclear Iran—with containment the only responsible option. Yet as an unregenerate upholder of the old consensus, I remain convinced that containment is impossible, from which it follows that the two choices before us are not war vs. containment but a conventional war now or a nuclear war later.