We are a grass roots organization located in both Israel and the United States. Our intention is to be pro-active on behalf of Israel. This means we will identify the topics that need examination, analysis and promotion. Our intention is to write accurately what is going on here in Israel rather than react to the anti-Israel media pieces that comprise most of today's media outlets.
Saturday, April 05, 2014
The story of an agent
The dramatic capture of Jonathan Pollard in
Washington in 1985 was accidental • Had Pollard made slightly different
decisions in the days before his arrest, he could have avoided life
He was apparently the most scatterbrained spy
Israel ever employed. Jonathan Pollard, a Jewish American citizen, then
31, could have avoided life imprisonment fairly easily had he chosen
slightly different actions in the last days before he was arrested.
His American friends never believed him capable of being a spy. "He seemed too sloppy," they said.
Pollard's dramatic capture was accidental. He
was at the center of an insignificant investigation that was about to be
closed, but because of one act of panic, he found himself behind bars
as one of the United States' biggest foes.
Pollard first attempted to work for American
security institutions in 1977. He applied to the CIA and was turned down
after failing the polygraph stage. In 1979, he achieved his desire when
he was hired to do security work for the U.S. Navy as a civilian
employee in Maryland. He relished the fact that the Navy did not know
that the CIA had rejected him two years earlier.
Two years after he was hired, he had a high
security clearance. He became an analyst of raw intelligence material.
He was suspended from his position when it was discovered that he had
been in contact with South African intelligence agents, but the
suspension was annulled very shortly afterward.
In June 1984, the Navy transferred Pollard to
work in the new Anti-Terrorism Advisory Council of the Threat
Intelligence and Analysis Division. Even before that, he had offered his
services to a colonel in the Israeli Air Force, Aviem Sella, who was on
a study break in the U.S. For close to two years, Pollard gave
thousands of documents to Sella, who transferred them to a special
At this stage, suspicions about Pollard began
to bubble, but every time they arose, they were quickly dismissed. But
one day, a colleague saw Pollard heading down to his car, even though
Pollard had said he was going to the office basement. At first, the
colleague disregarded what he saw, but later, on his wife's advice,
reported it to his supervisors. That started a chain of events that
seems as if it comes from a particularly bad action film.
Many details began to come together, even if,
after 30 years, they sound unbelievable. Pollard's wife, Anne, left
their home with a suitcase full of incriminating documents, saw an FBI
vehicle stopped near their home and was certain that she and her husband
had been found out, and quickly retraced her steps and asked her
neighbors to hide the suitcase in their home.
Had Anne chosen to dump the suitcase into the
nearest trash can, the affair would have ended differently. She was
simply upset because she did not know that the FBI agents were tracking
Ronald Pelton, another spy who worked for the National Security Agency,
who lived on their street.
The Pollards were not on the FBI's radar at
the time. Agents had already finished tracking Jonathan Pollard and were
about to close the investigation. Their opinion was firm: Pollard was a
ne'er-do-well incapable of taking part in what the administration
suspected. But Anne's mistake had already been made. The father of the
neighbor in whose home the suitcase had been hidden was a Navy officer,
and reported the mysterious suitcase to the security personnel on his
base. The information reached FBI officials, and it became only a matter
of time until Pollard was captured.
On Nov. 21, 1985, Pollard was caught. Shortly
before that, he had an opportunity to escape to the Israeli Embassy and
receive immunity. Three days before his capture, he failed another
polygraph test and had to confess that he had passed classified
documents to foreign agents. But the name of Israel never came up.
Actually, nobody knew that Pollard was a Jew
or that he considered his Jewishness important. He used that to claim,
falsely, that he had given the material to Kurt Lohbeck, a reporter for
the CBS network in Afghanistan, who gave it to Pakistan and another
country. Over the next three days, the American investigators contacted
their agents all over the world, but nobody suspected Israel.
Actually, the investigators made the right
choice. Pollard was caught red-handed. According to various testimonies,
he indeed passed information to the apartheid regime in South Africa,
passed valuable information to the Pakistanis, tried to make deals with
the Chinese, and sent information to Australia. It was finally
discovered that Israel had received help from him with documents that
Israel handed over to the Russians.
'An exaggerated punishment'
Twenty-four hours before he was captured,
Pollard told his handlers that he felt he was about to be arrested. He
knew he had to escape to the Israeli Embassy, but as the Americans
admitted, luck was with them when Pollard made his last mistake. All
Pollard had to do was call a taxi or even take a subway to reach the
embassy. But he chose to drive there in his car, which was under
surveillance by American agents.
When the Israelis saw that he was being
followed, the embassy gates were closed to him. For all practical
purposes, he was thrown to the surprised American agents who, together
with senior American officials, realized for the first time that Pollard
had spied for America's senior partner in the Middle East.
To this day, many Americans consider Pollard
the most dangerous spy in the history of American espionage.
Then-President Ronald Reagan said the only place for Pollard was prison.
High-ranking American security officials justified the sentence.
Still, FBI agent Michael Grimm would admit many years
later that he and his colleagues reached a different conclusion: "The
sentence meted out to Pollard was exaggerated and does not match the act
that was committed."