We are a grass roots organization located in both Israel and the United States. Our intention is to be pro-active on behalf of Israel. This means we will identify the topics that need examination, analysis and promotion. Our intention is to write accurately what is going on here in Israel rather than react to the anti-Israel media pieces that comprise most of today's media outlets.
In this official presidential photo,
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani announces to the Iranian national press
that a deal has been struck by Iran and six world powers to curb the
Iranian nuclear program with initial sanctions relief, during a press
conference at the presidential palace in Tehran, Iran on November 24,
2013. The six world powers involved in the negotiations were the United
States, France, Britain, Germany, China and Russia. UPI
| License Photo
HERNDON, Va., Nov. 26 (UPI) -- The late
ventriloquist Edgar Bergen used a dummy named Mortimer Snerd, a
character so dumb everything required a full explanation. Finally
understanding, Mortimer would shake his head in amazement, saying "Who'd
'a' thunk it (possible)?"
Understanding a fascinating realignment recently taking place in the
Middle East causes one to respond similarly, for it defies Islamic
logic. To better understand this realignment necessitates returning to
late 1990 and the first Persian Gulf War.
War with Iraq appeared unavoidable as Saddam Hussein refused, after invading Kuwait, a U.N. demand to withdraw. U.S. President H.W. George Bush worked diligently to draw together an alliance, including other Arab states, to confront the despot.
to Bush's success in keeping that alliance intact was Israel's
non-participation. This was so critical, Bush encouraged Israel, even in
the event of an Iraqi missile attack, not to retaliate; any attack by
Israel against one Arab state -- even if justified -- might well cause
other Arab states to drop out of the alliance or join Iraq.
Israel and Saddam understood this, prompting Iraq to try to draw the
Israelis in by launching Scud missiles against them. Knowing the United
States had their backs, the Israelis weren't provoked. The alliance held
together; victory was attained.
Despite its hatred of the United
States, Iran voiced little objection to the American-led attack against
Saddam. Having fought an eight-year war with Iraq ending three years
earlier in a stalemate, Iran's mullahs were ecstatic to see Saddam
defeated, although disappointed to see him remain in power. A patient
Iran would wait 12 more years and a second U.S.-Iraq conflict for their
archenemy to be toppled in 2003.
Arab countries such as Syria,
Egypt and Saudi Arabia joining the 1990 coalition of 34 countries did so
contrary to Islam -- i.e., believers shouldn't fight alongside
non-believers engaging another Muslim country. Perhaps Muslim coalition
members -- all Sunnis --- justified their alignment on the basis Iraq
was one of four Shiite-majority populated countries. Sunnis viewed
Shiites, as they do Westerners, as non-believers.
justification for Sunni coalition participation was self-preservation.
While Saddam was a Sunni (ruling a majority Shiite country), he was also
a "loose cannon."
Having invaded Sunni Kuwait on the basis it was
a province of Iraq, his Middle Eastern neighbors feared they might be
targeted next -- especially Saudi Arabia.
possessed weapons of mass destruction, which he already demonstrated a
willingness to use against Iran as well as his own people.
his WMDs might include nukes as well, self-survival became more of a
motivator to join the coalition than was Islam's religious bar against
Nonetheless, it was a diplomatic coup for Bush to forge together such a coalition to fight another Muslim country.
2013, we see the Iraq that U.S. forces fought to liberate under Iranian
influence. It isn't Iraq now posing a major threat to Sunnis but
Shiite-dominated Iran where mullahs remain committed to developing
nuclear weapons with which to threaten Sunnis and the West.
sign of things to come for Saudi Arabia and of an emboldened Iran,
mortar rounds were fired last week at a border post in northern Saudi
Arabia by an Iranian-backed Iraqi Shiite militia, which claimed it was a
warning to stop meddling in Iraqi affairs.
If non-nuclear Iran undertakes such a warning now, think what will happen once it has nukes.
While claiming it won't allow Iran to acquire nukes, the United States allows Tehran to do so.
latest effort at the negotiating table leaves Iran with access to
billions of dollars and to its belief it can continue enrichment without
requiring iron-tight Western verification that Tehran's program is
The United States plays no role in joining others truly
committed to denying Tehran nuclear weapons. This has created a once
unthinkable alliance in the region.
Recognizing President Barack Obama's
commitment to stop Iran is a bark lacking bite, Saudi Arabia -- deathly
concerned about a nuclear-armed Iran -- now has an aligned interest
with another country similarly committed to denying Tehran its goal --
An initial agreement granting Israel over-flight rights in
the event it attacked Iran has moved the two countries closer together
to formulate a joint plan to do what Obama won't.
Saudi Arabia fully understands Iran's threat is real -- something Obama doesn't.
It understands why Iran pursues a nuclear weapon -- to trigger its end-of-world belief of the 12th Imam's return.
also understands Iran's plan involves wrestling Islam's two most
religious sites—Mecca and Medina -- from the Saudis as "Guardians" of
same -- a role Iran believes destiny demands it play.
inaction has also caused the Saudis to renew earlier efforts to acquire a
nuclear weapon from Pakistan. If successful, Obama will have triggered a
nuclear arms race in the region.
There are signs Saudi Arabia
recognizes Israel has the commitment to prevent Iran from going nuclear
but may lack the full capability to do so. It understands an Israeli
attack may well represent Riyadh's last best hope to stop Iran. Thus,
the Saudis want to avoid being left in the situation where Riyadh,
alone, has to do so.
Accordingly, once again, it is self-survival
motivating Riyadh to join an alliance which for 1,400 years was never
In the Persian Gulf War, Israel refused to be
drawn into the conflict, knowing the United States. "had its back." As
Israel prepares now to step into the void left by Washington's lack of
commitment to confront the Iranian threat, it is Saudi Arabia looking to
protect Israel's back.
Quoting Mortimer, "Who'd 'a' thunk it."
retired U.S. Marine, Lt. Col. James Zumwalt served in the Vietnam War,
the U.S. invasion of Panama and the first Gulf War. He has written "Bare
Feet, Iron Will -- Stories from the Other Side of Vietnam's
Battlefields," "Living the Juche Lie: North Korea's Kim Dynasty" and
"Doomsday: Iran -- The Clock is Ticking.")
International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside
contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views
expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press
International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original
submissions are invited.)