Gerald Steinberg
In its September newsletter, the New Israel Fund (NIF) urged Israelis
to examine their behavior (“cheshbon nefesh”), declaring “We have been
telling you for some time about the upsurge in hatred and incitement in
Israel…” But, in Jewish tradition, the processes of introspection and
atonement for sins of commission and omission begin at home, including
for the NIF.
As the most powerful political and social framework in Israel outside
of the government, the NIF exerts major influence through its
funding—providing millions of dollars every year to dozens of
organizations.
The founding donors and officials sought to promote important social
objectives in a Zionist framework. But over the years, the Zionist
commitment became blurred, and money from pro-Israel donors was
channeled to extreme anti-Israel organizations, including key supporters
of the BDS (boycott, divestment and sanctions) campaigns. NIF’s network
also played a central role in the discredited Goldstone report, which
falsely accused the Israeli military of systematic war crimes. In
addition, while claiming to promote liberal, progressive Jewish values, a
number of NIF-funded groups push highly intolerant and polarizing
agendas, amplifying the impact of radical fringes in Israeli society, at
the expense of the democratic consensus.
As a result, NIF is viewed with increasing suspicion by many Israelis
and in a number of diaspora communities. In response, in September
2010, the NIF leadership belatedly adopted guidelines to prevent funding for groups that work “to deny the right of the Jewish people to sovereign self-determination within Israel.”
In some important cases, these guidelines have been implemented, and
in 2011, the NIF ended funding for three NGOs—Mada al-Carmel, Al-Qaws,
and Coalition of Women for Peace (CWP)—that promote demonization.
Unfortunately, the NIF failed to publicly acknowledge the reasons for
ending support, or to explain how these extreme groups were funded in
the first place. Indeed, NIF remains a highly non-transparent
organization, without the checks and balances or democratic processes
that are necessary to prevent abuses and highly damaging mistakes in
judgment. While belatedly cutting off these three grantees, the NIF
continued to fund groups involved in global demonization campaigns, such
as Adalah, Breaking the Silence, Machsom Watch, and Yesh Din.
In 2011, the NIF also began funding for three additional divisive
NGOs, including +972 Magazine, a blog pushing a radical fringe agenda. A
number of +972’s bloggers have invoked the immoral and false
“apartheid” analogy, and in a February 2012 interview in The Nation, Noam Sheizaf, +972’s editor-in-chief, referred to Jerusalem as an “apartheid city.” In May 2012, +972 published a cartoon
depicting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu raping President
Barack Obama and eating his limbs. And in September, Sheizaf used his
twitter account to refer to critics as “the Jewish KKK”
and “fascist”—reinforcing the image of the NIF network as exploiting a
“progressive” and “liberal” façade for extreme polarization and hate
speech.
In contrast to the actual behavior of the grantees, NIF has justified
its funding for +972 as support for a “progressive view of domestic
issues and Israel’s foreign relations” and of “broad public discussion
and constituencies.” However, this English-only site is unknown to the
“broad” Hebrew-speaking Israeli public. Rather, its targeting of an
international audience with a message that demonizes Israel and attacks
opponents (real and imagined) is entirely inconsistent with NIF’s stated
aims and principles.
Another new grantee, Human Rights Defenders Fund (HRDF), also raises many concerns regarding NIF’s decision making. HRDF is administered by Lizi Sagie, who was forced to resign
from B’Tselem in April 2010 after she referred to Israel’s Memorial Day
as “a pornographic circus” on her personal blog. She then had a short
stint as a co-director of ICAHD, a fringe Israeli NGO that supports a
“one state” political formula—meaning the end of Jewish national
sovereignty.
Michael Sfard is a key part
of the HRDF operation, advising the board on “application of Aid
Criteria when reviewing aid requests” and monitoring the “performance of
attorneys receiving aid.” According to reports,
Sfard is the lawyer for a group of defendants involved in a private
libel suit and receiving funds through HRDF. These activities appear to
contradict the NGO’s mandate, and create at least the appearance of a
conflict of interest.
In addition, NIF authorized $162,430 for Sheikh Jarrah Solidarity
Movement (SJSM) in 2011. This organization’s main activities revolve
around confrontational protests in the Negev, East Jerusalem, and the
West Bank. In March 2012, a very crude and offensive poster
was posted on the official Facebook page of SJSM, and then removed
after harsh criticism from some of its members and women’s rights
activists.
All of these funding decisions for divisive groups were taken under
an NIF leadership that has recently changed, particularly with the
appointment of a new president, Brian Lurie. It is possible that under
Lurie, NIF’s long overdue “cheshbon nefesh” will now begin, perhaps
leading to changes in funding policies promoting demonization and
polarization. Before preaching to others about Jewish morality and
ethics, the NIF needs to return to and apply these values to its own
activities.
Gerald M. Steinberg heads NGO Monitor and is professor of political science at Bar Ilan University.
No comments:
Post a Comment