The
more I think about Israel’s security situation at this moment, the
better it looks. Obviously, this is counter-intuitive given the media
bias, academic distortions, and campaigns for sanctions of various
kinds. And, of course, Israel starts from a basis of facing far more
security challenges than any other modern state. Still, by Israeli
standards the outlook is good.
It’ll take a while to list all of the factors so let’s get started while the inkwell is still full.
On
the surface, the “Arab Spring” along with the surge of revolutionary
Islamism certainly looks bad but let’s examine the shorter-term
implications. By reentering a period of instability and continuing
conflict within each country, the Arabic-speaking world is committing a
self-induced setback. Internal battles will disrupt Arab armies and
economies, reducing their ability to fight against Israel. Indeed,
nothing could be more likely to handicap development than Islamist
policies.
While one shouldn't
depend too much on expecting Arab regimes to be too busy dealing with
domestic transformation to want to stage foreign adventures against
Israel, this is far more true than in past decades. And even if they
would like to attack Israel they are less able to do so effectively
given their disrupted societies, weakened armies, uncertain alliances,
and lack of a Western sponsor.
Every
Arabic-speaking country is likely to be wracked by internal violence,
conflict, disorder, and slow socio-economic progress for years, even
decades, to come.
Westerners are
going to be disillusioned as reform stalls; the oppression of women
increases; and Islamism produces unattractive partners. True, the
Western left romanticizes Islamism but the number of people persuaded
that these regimes are more attractive than Israel will be less as what
Marxism traditionally described as “clerical-fascist” movements
flourish.
Moreover, for Turkey
and Iran the last year has been a disaster for their regional power
ambitions. With rising Arab Sunni Islamist movements in Libya, Tunisia,
Egypt, and Syria, Sunni Arabs see no need to turn to non-Arab Turks and
non-Arab, non-Sunni Persians.
Turkey’s
influence is limited to northern Iraq and, thanks largely to the Obama
Administration’s backing, with the Syrian opposition. And if Syria
became either Sunni Islamist or more moderate democratic, Damascus would
quickly dispense with any need for Turkish patronage.
As
for Iran, it has lost virtually all of its non-Shia Muslim assets,
notably Hamas. Again, Sunni Arab Islamists are not going to follow
Tehran’s lead while Sunni Arab countries don’t want to yield leadership
of “their” Middle East to Tehran.
Therefore,
the big Middle East conflict of this era will be Sunni-Shia, not
Arab-Israeli. But a series of conflicts have broken out all along the
Sunni-Shia borderland as the two blocs vie for control of Lebanon,
Syria, Iraq, and Bahrain.
In
addition, the Syrian civil war is wrecking that country and will
continue to paralyze it for some time to come. When the dust settles,
any new government is going to have to take a while to manage the
wreckage, handle the quarreling, diverse ethnic-religious groups, and
rebuild its military. In Lebanon, a dominant Hizballah, trying to hold
onto power and worrying about the fate of its Syrian patron, doesn’t
want a confrontation with Israel.
Then
there are the surviving traditionalist regimes—Saudi Arabia, Jordan,
and the five other Gulf emirates—who know the main threat to them is
from Iran and revolutionary Islamists at home, not Israel. In fact, they
realize, Israel is a kind of protector for them since it also opposes
those who want to put their heads on the chopping block.
An
extremely important point to note is how completely Arabs, and
especially Palestinians, threw away the greatest opportunity they’ve
ever had to gain more U.S. support and widen the cracks between
Washington and Jerusalem into a chasm. If properly motivated, the Obama
Administration was ready to become the most actively pro-Palestinian
government in American history, to offer more concessions to the
Palestinian Authority (PA), and to put more pressure on Israel than ever
seen before.
Instead, they
refused to cooperate with Obama and rejected his initiatives. The PA
wasted Obama's entire term in refusing even to negotiate with Israel.
Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, the PA repeatedly showed the
U.S. government that it was the intransigent party. And even if American
officials would never publicly admit this, they certainly had to give
up as a result.
I provide this
list not to rejoice at the misfortunes of others, even those who are
hostile, because their people are the real victims. But these
misfortunes are the result of decisions they made. This is the reality
of the Middle East today.
On the
other side has been Israel’s dramatic success in terms of economic
progress. The country has become a world leader in high-technology,
medicine, science, computers, and other fields. It has opened up new
links to Asia. The discovery of natural gas and oilfields promise a
massive influx of funds in the coming years.
And
despite the usual internal quarrels (social protests, debates over
drafting religious students, nasty flaps over personalities, and minor
corruption scandals) Israel is basically a stable and united (where it
counts) country. The idea that Israel is menaced by the failure to get
official peace with the Palestinians is a staple of Western blather but
has no big impact in reality.
Of
course, there are threats—Iran getting deliverable nuclear weapons;
Egypt becoming belligerent—but both lie in the future and there are
constraining factors. In Iran’s case, there is external pressure and
problems actually building weapons; for Egypt, the army as well as the
balance of force constrains the radical Islamists. And if there are
conflicts, Israel is well able to defend itself.
Foreign
editorial writers may never admit it; foreign correspondents may
thunder doom, but nonetheless Israel and its security are in good shape.
This article is available here. A different version of the article is published in the Jerusalem Post.
This article is available here. A different version of the article is published in the Jerusalem Post.
No comments:
Post a Comment