We are a grass roots organization located in both Israel and the United States. Our intention is to be pro-active on behalf of Israel. This means we will identify the topics that need examination, analysis and promotion. Our intention is to write accurately what is going on here in Israel rather than react to the anti-Israel media pieces that comprise most of today's media outlets.
Monday, June 04, 2012
I want to make a number of points that few if any are making about Netanyahu’s proposal for the Ulpana demolition order.
1. If he can arrange for 50 homes to be built in Beit El, why doesn’t he do it in any event. What is he waiting for.
He said: “It is always possible to resolve this through legislation,
but that comes with a price, including in the international arena.” and
“The bill could be disqualified by the Court and cause problems
internationally, which would result in the outpost being evacuated and damage to the entire settlement enterprise”. Why
is he so worried about what the reaction in the “international area”
will be? How can the international community react more to such
legislation than it will to 50 more homes? And on what basis will they
get upset? That the Knesset over ruled the Court? That’s not a war
crime, its democracy. Why is he more worried about the world than he is
about his constituency but for whom he wouldn’t be Prime Minister.
he is saying is shocking. He is saying that if we anger the
intervational community, they can force the removal of the entire
settlement and further damage the settlement enterprise. The suggestion
that they have so much power is
We are told that his government has a policy of demolishing Jewish
homes on “private Palestinian land” and pursuant to that policy the
Government lawyers asked the Court to issue the demolition order. Why
does the Government of Israel have such a policy? Why doesn’t it change
the policy? Why doesn’t the policy apply to Arab built homes on “private
Palestinian land”? Why does our government not argue in Court that the
houses were built in good faith and thus it is up to the Court to weigh
whether it is better to demolish or to compensate? Given the fact that
the Court was just enforcing the request of the government why can the
government not change its mind?
4. Why is the
government not passing a law that in future, the lower court must first
determine the facts of ownership. If there is no valid claim to
ownership, then what is “private Palestinian land”? Does
5. Why is the government letting Arabs plant on State lands but not Jews?
Why does the government seek demolition of Jewish homes built illegally
in Area C and not Arab homes which are built illegally in Arab C?