...the
war on terrorism has been turned into the war for terrorism.
It
is not every day that one can announce a shift in world history, but this day is
today. And we are now in a new era in the Middle East and the world. This is not
a joke--definitely not a joke--and as you will see, it is not an
exaggeration.
Let
me explain. For the last seven weeks I have been in the United States, mostly in
Washington D.C. I have spoken and listened to many people. As a result, I am in
a position to describe for you with a high degree of accuracy what the policy
will be for the next 3.5 years, and perhaps for many more.
The
administration has crossed a line to, in simple terms, backing the "'bad
guys."
This
is literally true in Egypt, Syria, Sudan, the Palestinian Authority, Bahrain
(with its support for the opposition), Qatar, and Turkey.
And
in some ways, as we will see, the war on terrorism has been turned into the war
for terrorism.
Too
extreme? On the contrary, this is not a conservative or liberal analysis but
merely a true one. Come along over the next few weeks, and let's take a serious
analysis 0f Obama's Middle East policy in the second term, from 2013 to January
20, 2017.
The
real diplomatic line is: Bad boy, Bibi (and Israel), why
can he/they not be moderate and flexible (unlike releasing 100 terrorist
murderers in exchange for nothing), like Palestinian Authority Leader
Mahmoud Abbas (and the Palestinians, who [Abbas] in fact is inflexible,
constantly; escalates demands; and rejects U.S. strategy on the peace process);
or like Turkey's Prime Minister Erdogan (throwing intellectuals and
journalists in prison, betraying U.S. strategy 0n Iran, backing anti-American
Islamists, and sending former army officers for long jail terms on phony
charges)?
During
the coming months, and even years, if they are given to me, I will pursue these
themes. You may not believe what you read here today or tomorrow, but you will,
oh you will see it.
But
before we begin, let me repeat that this is going to happen. It
will not change, and as shocking as it is, this is already happening. It is
unavoidable, because with a president who will not learn, a bought-off elite, a
sold-out second-term Congress, and a remarkably cowardly or partisan media,
nothing will change. The situation will only get worse and more
obvious.
In
this series of articles, I will describe eight very likely things that will
almost certainly happen during the rest of Obama’s term, extending far beyond
Israel, and how to minimize the harm to the interests of the United States and
of its would-be Middle Eastern allied people and governments.
Here
are the inevitable themes, any one of which would be horrid enough but note they
can all be mitigated and delayed.
ISRAEL
CANNOT DEPEND ON THE UNITED STATES.
That
doesn’t mean that Obama and others will not provide military aid or say nice
words at every event. But there is no commitment that one can assume would be
fulfilled nor any Israeli initiative that will really be implemented.
This
is a complex issue, but here are some brief points:
The
idea that Obama and his team are the greatest friend of Israel is a deadly
insult, and I can prove it two minutes.
Minute
one: The United States has undermined Israel on many issues. Do I have to
provide a list?
Okay,
here is a partial list: Egypt (support for a hostile Muslim Brotherhood
government); Tunisia (ditto); Sinai (enablement of insurgency); Hamas (the
desire to keep the Brotherhood--an ally of Hamas--government in power in Cairo);
Turkey (supporting the Islamist, anti-Israel government); Syria (support of
radical Syrian Islamists); Europe (lack of support for Israeli position on peace
process); America itself (encouragement of anti-Israel forces among Jewish
community and in Obama constituency); Palestinians (lack of criticism or
pressure on Palestinian Authority, PA).
I’ll
save more for later, but I think this is an impressive list.
Minute
two: But, there’s something more here. The most dangerous, insulting argument
is this: Secretary of State John Kerry has repeatedly said--and this is the
theme of the administration supporters, including Jewish supporters:
The
greatest danger to Israel is if Israel does not get peace soon.
This
is an absurd lie. The greatest danger to Israel would be for Israel to accept a
dangerous and unworkable peace agreement that the other side would not
implement.
In
other words, the greatest danger for Israel would be to listen to the bad advice
of Obama, Kerry, and their supporters.
Consider
this; who should be more knowledgeable about their situation and more aware of
their real interests, Israel or America? Do people think that Obama knows better
than Israelis? Does he care more? That’s absurd and insulting.
Of
course, people assume that states and political leaderships put their own
interests first, whether or not they understand this. And that lays the basis
for overruling Israel’s democracy.
For
example, a survey by the very dovish Israeli Democracy Institute (IDI) showed
65.6 percent of Israelis questioned did not expect to see a deal in talks
between Israel and the
Palestinians within a year. And if you take into the account the don't-knows and
no opinions, that increases the percentage.
Incidentally,
spot the gimmick in Reuters’ story:
“The
talks resumed last month after a three-year hiatus.” Actually, except for one
week there have not been real talks for 13 years."
Second
gimmick:
“But
even if the Israeli government managed to defy skeptics and secure an accord,
the poll uggested it would struggle to sell it to its people.”
Wrong,
the government and the vast majority of the people agree with each other.
But there is a revealing hint here. The U.S. government and its supporters
believe that the Israeli government in partnership with Obama should betray the
beliefs, aspirations, and security of the Israeli people. And we are not only
talking about Jewish settlements, even for those willing to give every one up
for real, lasting peace.
In fact, 55.5 percent of the Israeli people--and 63 percent of Israeli Jews--said it was were against Israel to agree to return to the 1967 lines, even if there were land swaps which would enable some Jewish settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem to remain part of Israel. It is not the terms ostensibly offered, but the credibility of the United States and the Palestinians.
Mind
you, the figure is higher, because most people feel that this simply won't work
in terms of providing more security and stability.
You
cannot understand what has just happened without the analogy of the monster
movie. Israel is not naïve, but it was walking down a dark alley and thought
that kindly old Uncle Sam--perhaps a bit grumpier lately--had his back; then it
peered over its shoulder and froze in horror at seeing a scary monster. Yet you
will never ever hear an Israeli politician admit that.
Read Netanyahu's unprecedented memo on the talks and the
prisoner release. It reads as if he saw
a ghost; he is trying to signal something very grim and serious, and there is no
implication that he believes in any possibility of compensation for this
concession.
Faced
with a wasted effort of an extremely unilateral Palestinian prisoner release,
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government went along because they realized
something in the middle: This was not a routine exercise. During the process,
they realized that the indifference of the United States to Israel’s interests
was extremely high; that Congress was hypnotized; that the Jewish community in
its Obama worship was largely neutralized; and that rather than fighting
European hostility, the White House was conducting it.
Looking
over their shoulder in the misty night, they realized that a very large monster
was following them. If you read Netanyahu’s unprecedented memo to the Israeli
people as to why the terrorist prisoners were released, you get that clear
signal. They realized that the Obama administration was extremely dangerous and
that it was necessary to buy time.
Of
course, the talks will not go anywhere, because the Palestinians know that they
have a strong hand and they will overplay it. But the administration's
willingness to punish Israel to win public relations points and shore up the
doomed U.S. alignment with Islamists has to be reckoned with.
No comments:
Post a Comment