Israel's Response Is Disproportionate

Jonathan Mark
Spectator

I condemn Israel's disproportionate attack on Hamas because, so far, it has only lasted four days and I would like to see a proportionate response that terrifies Hamas for seven years, the years that have filled Sderot and neighboring towns with nightmares, death, amputations and trauma coming from rockets and mortars fired from Gaza.
Editorial from this week's SPECTATOR


Israel's Response Is Disproportionate
By Jonathan Mark

I condemn Israel's disproportionate attack on Hamas because, so far, it has only lasted four days and I would like to see a proportionate response that terrifies Hamas for seven years, the years that have filled Sderot and neighboring towns with nightmares, death, amputations and trauma coming from rockets and mortars fired from Gaza.

Perhaps a proportionate response would have Gaza 's leaders fearful of being killed every day for the next two years, as Gilad Shalit has been terrified of torture and death every day for the last two years in his solitary Gaza dungeon.

A proportionate response would have Hamas mothers and fathers as fearful for their children's lives as Shalit's mother and father have been fearful for Gilad's life.

A proportionate response would have Gaza 's children crying for their mommies and daddies, the way at a Hamas pageant earlier in December a Palestinian actor dressed as Shalit got down on his knees, mock-begging in Hebrew for his Ima and Abba while the Gaza crowds laughed.

A proportionate response would so intimidate Hamas that they will grovel and, as a "gesture," send cocoa and jam into Sderot, the way Israel has groveled in response to rockets from Hamas, sending cocoa and jam into Gaza . Imagine Churchill sending cocoa and jam into Berlin as a humanitarian gesture after - during - the bombing of London .

A proportionate response would be one that will convince Hamas there is no
military solution, no solution but surrender. They can then call surrender a
"peace process," if they like, just as the mostly unanswered attacks on Jews
have convinced some Jews that there is no military solution but surrender to
any and all demands.
They suggest a euthanasia by the euphemism of "peace process," that Israel
become what some are already planning to call "Canaan," a non-Jewish state
of all its citizens.

A proportionate response will convince
Palestinians that if they insist that the starting point to peace
negotiations is that no Jew be allowed to live on the West Bank, the
proportionate response will be that Israel 's starting point in negotiations
is that no Arab be allowed to live in Tel Aviv. Horrible to contemplate?
Fine, let there be a proportionate negotiation.

A proportionate response to Hamas, one might gather from the European
scolds, would be as if the United States , after Pearl Harbor , would bomb
just a few Japanese fishing boats and call it a day, believing the war would
have ended with that.

A proportionate response will begin to remind Jews that there is no peace
process like victory, just as Israel 's decade of disproportionate restraint
and self-doubt has convinced young Palestinians that their victory is
inevitable, like Aryan youth in 1933 singing "Tomorrow Belongs To Me."

Let it be said to Israelis and Jews everywhere, in the words of Churchill:
"You have enemies?
Good. It means you've stood up for something."
But remember: A war (and Hamas has repeatedly said this is war) is never won
if you are disproportionately kind to someone who wants to destroy you and,
failing in that, demands with indignation that you not destroy him.

When meeting that enemy, be proportionate.
JWR contributor Jonathan Mark is Associate Editor of the New York Jewish
Week.
© 2008, Jonathan Mark