Alan Dershowitz
Now that President Obama is on his way back from his trip to the
Middle East, its potential impact can be assessed. All in all it was a
success, despite some pitfalls.
Whenever a high ranking American dignitary visits Israel, there is
concern that something will happen—new settlement building, further
rocket attacks—to spoil the visit. It happened again, as President Obama
was visiting President Abbas, having had a positive meeting with Prime
Minister Netanyahu. This time the spoiler was neither Hamas nor the
settlement builders (though rockets were fired and settlements
expanded). It was The New York Times, running an extensive and
illustrated story casting doubt on President Obama's signature gift to
Israel: America's financial support for the joint anti-missile system
called "Iron Dome."
The success of the Iron Dome has been central to Israeli-American
relations, as well to the security policies of both countries. An
anti-missile system capable of destroying up to 90% of Hamas rockets
directed at Israeli population centers has made it possible for Israel
to focus on prevention rather than deterrence.
We are a grass roots organization located in both Israel and the United States. Our intention is to be pro-active on behalf of Israel. This means we will identify the topics that need examination, analysis and promotion. Our intention is to write accurately what is going on here in Israel rather than react to the anti-Israel media pieces that comprise most of today's media outlets.
Saturday, March 23, 2013
From Cairo 2009 to Jerusalem 2013
Ambassador (ret.) Yoram Ettinger, "Second Thought: a US-Israel Initiative”
"Israel Hayom”, March 22, 2013, http://bit.ly/14hfaoH
Is President Obama learning from history by avoiding – or repeating - the crucial errors of his 2009 visit to the Middle East?
In 2009, Obama anticipated engagement, rather than confrontation, with Iran, which threatens the survival of pro-US Arab regimes in the Persian Gulf and beyond. Obama expected an Arab Spring and a march of pro-US democracy on the Arab Street, rather than the stormy, tectonic anti-US Arab Winter. Just like President Carter's reckless abandonment of the Shah and his courting of Khomeini, President Obama turned his back on America's ally, Mubarak, while extending his hand to America's inherent enemy, the trans-national, subversive Muslim Brotherhood.
"Israel Hayom”, March 22, 2013, http://bit.ly/14hfaoH
Is President Obama learning from history by avoiding – or repeating - the crucial errors of his 2009 visit to the Middle East?
In 2009, Obama anticipated engagement, rather than confrontation, with Iran, which threatens the survival of pro-US Arab regimes in the Persian Gulf and beyond. Obama expected an Arab Spring and a march of pro-US democracy on the Arab Street, rather than the stormy, tectonic anti-US Arab Winter. Just like President Carter's reckless abandonment of the Shah and his courting of Khomeini, President Obama turned his back on America's ally, Mubarak, while extending his hand to America's inherent enemy, the trans-national, subversive Muslim Brotherhood.
Friday, March 22, 2013
On Palestinian Shoes
President Barack Obama urged Israelis to consider the view from the other side, basically saying:
Put yourself in Palestinian shoes
His exact words were:
But the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination and justice must also be recognized. Put yourself in their shoes – look at the world through their eyes
Mr. Obama, look what Palestinian shoes do, to you and to us:
Dear Gov. Huckabee,
Yesterday when I opened the Jerusalem Post I saw a copy your
full-page Gush Katif address printed for those of us who live in Israel.
It was a lovely surprise at first but then, I realized that it should not have
been- because you are always ready to support us no matter where you
are.
We know what a dedicated and loyal friend you are - one who
truly understands our history and our rights to this land. At a time when
Israel has so many enemies and anti-Semitism is once again rearing its ugliness
worldwide, your vision and courage in speaking out is so
appreciated.
At this particular time, we are again being pressured to agree
to the creation of yet another terrorist apartheid state - this one
'Palestine' - in the heartland of our democratic precious ancient
homeland! Would such an outrageous demand be made of any other country -
and would that country agree?!
Obama’s grim message to Jerusalem
JOHN BOLTON
The
White House is contending that Barack Obama’s first visit to Israel as
president underlines his administration’s commitment to Israel’s
security.
Rarely, however, has the style and symbolism of a political maneuver been more distant from the underlying substance.
Rarely, however, has the style and symbolism of a political maneuver been more distant from the underlying substance.
"The Party's Over"
If indeed there ever was a party,
except in people's imaginations.
I must confess something
here. I understand better today how Obama got re-elected. I'm seeing
his charm up close and when he turns it on, it's considerable. Then it
becomes a question of what to accept as real....
~~~~~~~~~~
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
A Case Study of Media Manipulation on the Middle East: Slate About Me
Barry Rubin
Here's what Slate has to say about me:
Here's what Slate has to say about me:
"The
anti-Obama peace-process skeptics
can’t help but gloat. As Barry Rubin, a conservative, pro-Israel
American pundit put it on his Facebook page: “I think we have just won a
huge victory … Obama has admitted defeat on trying to bully,
manipulate, or pressure Israel.'"
This is a very revealing sentence in several respects:
--First
of all, the
article was not on my Facebook page. On my Facebook page was a link to
my article in PJMedia. Zacharia is not a friend on my Facebook page so
she could not have seen the material quoted there. Consequently, she
wrote it that way to avoid having to admit the existence of PJ Media and
linking to that publication. By saying something was on my Facebook
page--rather than on one of the biggest news/analysis sites on the
Internet--I am to be made to sound like a basement-dwelling blogger.
Obama's mysterious visit
Why
is US President Barack Obama coming to Israel today? In 2008, then
president George W. Bush came to celebrate Israel's 60th Independence
Day, and to reject Israeli requests for assistance in destroying Iran's
nuclear installations.
In
1996, then-president Bill Clinton came to Israel to help then-prime
minister Shimon Peres's electoral campaign against Likud leader Binyamin
Netanyahu.
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
U.S. Government Funding Radical Israeli NGOs' Information Operations
CAROLINE GLICK
March 19, 2013
Earlier this month NGO (Non-governmental organization) Monitor released its report
on foreign government funding of radical political Israeli NGOs which
work to undermine Israel's international standing and subvert Israeli
society. Along with the usual European suspects who give millions of
shekels (or Euros or pounds) to Israeli groups like this, it works out
that the US government is also funding extremely radical organizations,
courtesy of American taxpayers. Notably, the three groups that reported
receiving funding from the US are all in the business of waging
political warfare campaigns directed at the Israeli public.
PA's welcome to Obama: Americans behind 9/11 attacks and Hitler was greater than Roosevelt
Official PA daily:
History is written by the victors,
therefore "Muslim terrorists" are falsely blamed for 9/11
and Nazism is prosecuted instead of honored
"Had Hitler won, Nazism would be an honor"
by Itamar Marcus and Nan Jacques Zilberdik
Two days before US President Barack Obama's visit to Israel and the PA, the official PA daily chose to print anti-American hate speech along with pro-Hitler comments in an op-ed:
"Our history is replete with lies... [including] the lie about Al-Qaeda and the September 11 events, which asserted that Muslim terrorists committed it, and that it was not an internal American action by the Freemasons."
The op-ed further implies that Hitler was greater than both Churchill and Roosevelt, who were "alcoholics":
Ministers and Senior Officials of the 33rd Government of Israel 18 Mar 2013
|
Monday, March 18, 2013
Obama and Netanyahu – ReStart
Gerald M. Steinberg
In their second act, will Benjamin Netanyahu
and Barack Obama find happiness, and cooperate on policies that will
best serve both Israeli and American interests?
The answer does not depend on psychology or
individual personalities. Serious leaders leave their private likes and
dislikes behind when it comes to serious issues – Churchill, Roosevelt
and Stalin did what they had to, despite the deep animosities. And Sadat
and Begin did not need to play golf in order to negotiate peace.
A Peace Agreement and Israel's New Government
myrightword
Haaretz reports:
The actual Coalition Guidelines first paragraph reads:
Haaretz reports:
The coalition agreements signed with both parties make almost no mention of the peace process...Habayit Hayehudi added a clause to the agreement requiring the government to pass a law within 90 days mandating a referendum over any agreement that includes handing over territory.
The actual Coalition Guidelines first paragraph reads:
To the Jewish people the inalienable right for a state in the Land of Israel, its historical national homeland of the Jews.
A new 'bargaining chip' as Obama comes to Israel
A special nanochip containing the founding
declarations of U.S. and Israel is set in ancient stone to be handed to
Obama • "Unique gift symbolizes the main messages of the visit — the
strong and deep bilateral ties," Prime Minister's Office says.
The nanochip U.S. President
Barack Obama will get from the prime minister, with the Jerusalem stone
underneath.
|
Photo credit: Yoav Bachar & Shlomo Shoham, Technion. |
||||
|
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will give
U.S. President Barack Obama a special gold-coated silicon nanochip
containing the U.S.'s Declaration of Independence written alongside
Israel's founding document.
Sunday, March 17, 2013
Israel's military intelligence chief says Syria's embattled president, Bashar al-Assad, is preparing to use chemical weapons.
Maj. Gen. Aviv Kochavi told a security conference in the coastal town of
Herzliya that Assad is stepping up his offensive against rebels trying to oust
him.
Kochavi claims Assad is making advanced preparations to use chemical
weapons, but has not yet given the order to deploy them.
Coalition guidelines to change Israel's religious status quo
The planned reforms could include a new
military draft law, a tweaked system of government, and a new Basic Law
that puts Israel's Jewish character ahead of its democratic nature •
National religious to control rabbinate and conversion apparatus.
The issue of haredim serving
in the army and sharing the burden play a major role in the 33rd
government's formation. [Archive]
|
Photo credit: Reuters |
The new coalition agreements between
Likud-Beytenu, Yesh Atid and Habayit Hayehudi may result in sweeping
changes on many fronts, ranging from the control of religious
institutions to the very identity of the state.
Among the first orders of business for the new
government is the passage of a new budget for the 2013-2014 fiscal year
and the enactment of a national service law that would replace the de
facto blanket exemption ultra-Orthodox currently enjoy. In addition, the
mandatory length of service in some units would be cut to two years for
all draftees. (Currently Israeli men serve three years and women, two.)
Both of these items must be submitted for a vote within 45 days.
Biased, Prejudiced, and Unprofessional: The UN Human Rights Council Fact-Finding Mission Report on Israeli Settlements
Alan Baker
- On 31 January 2013 the "International Fact-Finding Mission on Israeli Settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory" published its findings on the implications of Israeli settlements on the human rights of the Palestinian people.
- The enabling resolution of the Human Rights Council, the composition of the mission, its mandate, mode of operation, and substantive content are, from the outset, based on a premise that considers Israel's settlement policy to be illegal. This premise dictates the one-sided and prejudiced nature of the mission and its report.